ALGORITHM HAS PROVIDED

Last updated: June 18, 2025, 22:57  |  Written by: Justin Sun

Algorithm Has Provided
Algorithm Has Provided

More Than Two

More than two-thirds of Americans are concerned about the negative effects of AI and 61% believe it could threaten civilization.

AI threatens humanity’s future, 61% of Americans say:

According to a report by Stanford University’s Institute for Human-Centered A.I, 36% of computer science experts believed that decisions made by artificial intelligence

More Than Two

According to a recent Reuters/Ipsos survey, 61% of Americans are concerned about the dangers associated with artificial intelligence

More than two-thirds of Americans are concerned about the negative effects of AI and 61% believe it could threaten civilization. The swift growth of artificial intelligence

Experts and the public aren’t confident that the government will regulate AI effectively: 62% of U.S. adults and 53% of the experts we surveyed say they have not too

The Poll Found That Over

A Reuters/Ipsos poll published on Wednesday has found that 61 percent of Americans believe artificial intelligence (AI) could threaten civilization. Only 22 percent

The poll found that over two-thirds of respondents are anxious about the adverse effects of AI, while 61 percent consider it a potential threat to civilization.

6 in AI as threat to humanity’s future: poll - The Hill

How the U.S. Public and AI Experts View Artificial Intelligence

AI threatens humanity’s future, 61% of Americans say: Survey

61% of Americans believe AI threatens civilization, reveals new poll

The Reuters

61% of Americans Feel Threatened by AI: One-third of Experts Agree

Poll: AI poses risk to humanity, according to majority of Americans

The Reuters/Ipsos poll published Wednesday found that 61 percent of Americans believed AI is a threat to humanity’s future, while about 22 percent reported they

Justin Sun can be reached at [email protected].

Articles tagged with "Elon Musk threatens to ban iPhones and MacBooks at" (1 found)

← Back to article

Comments