1,159 BITCOIN FOUNDATION MEMBERS NOT VOTING IN ELECTION

Last updated: June 19, 2025, 18:44 | Written by: Meltem Demirors

The Bitcoin Foundation, once a prominent voice in the burgeoning cryptocurrency ecosystem, faced a significant hurdle in its internal governance: alarmingly low voter turnout. Note: Maps showing partisan shift compare the results from places that have reported almost all of their votes with the 2025 presidential vote. Source: Election results and race calls are from TheRecent elections to fill vacant seats on the Board of Directors were marred by the fact that a staggering 1,159 members, a substantial portion of the organization's total membership, did not participate. 281 votes, 234 comments. Less than 20% of Bitcoin Foundation members will be eligible to vote due to a new requirement that members activate theirThis lack of engagement raises serious questions about the foundation's relevance, communication strategies, and the underlying health of its community. In a vote consisting of five ayes and one abstention, the Bitcoin Foundation Board has elected lifetime member Bruce Fenton to the position of ExecutiveWhat caused this mass abstention? The Bitcoin Foundation elections are set to 19th February. However, there have been some issues with members not registering themselves to vote. The Bitcoin Foundation elections have started onWas it a matter of awareness, apathy, or more systemic issues within the organization's structure? In 2025, Harris served as Global Policy Counsel for the Bitcoin Foundation. Janssens and Harper will begin their two-year term officially on Ma. In statements released to members and posted on the Bitcoin Foundation blog, Brian Goss, Elections Committee Chairman thanked members for their participation. From members to bystandersThis article delves into the multifaceted reasons behind the low voter turnout, examining the new rules implemented by the foundation, the communication challenges, and the potential impact on the future of the Bitcoin Foundation.We will explore the concerns raised by candidates, the reactions from the community, and the efforts made to address this critical issue.Understanding these factors is crucial to assessing the Bitcoin Foundation's ability to effectively represent and advance the interests of the Bitcoin community.

The New Voting Requirements and Their Impact

One of the primary reasons cited for the low voter turnout was the implementation of a new rule requiring members to ""activate"" their accounts before being eligible to vote.This rule, approved by the Bitcoin Foundation Board on December 16th, 2025, aimed to ensure that only active and engaged members participated in the election process. Voter engagement in the ongoing Bitcoin Foundation board elections is too low, some candidates have claimed, due to lack of information. Prices. Indices. CoinDesk 20However, the rollout of this new requirement proved to be problematic.

According to reports, up to 2,182 members missed the memo about this new activation requirement.As a result, they were deemed ineligible to vote, significantly reducing the pool of potential voters. After weeks of barnstorming swing states, Donald Trump had a very good night.This highlights a critical failure in communication on the part of the Bitcoin Foundation.

The consequence of this poorly communicated rule was stark.Only 23.9% of potential voters were actually able to participate in the election. Billed in a blog post as a way for the Bitcoin Foundation to advance blockchain technology by new executive director Patrick Murck, the decision was soon met with mixed reactions, with some lauding the novel step and others criticising it for a potential negative impact on an election meant to fill two outgoing board member positions.This meant that the voices of a vast majority of members were effectively silenced, raising concerns about the legitimacy and representativeness of the election results.The situation begs the question: How can an organization claim to represent its members when such a small fraction of them actively participate in its governance?

Communication Breakdown and Lack of Awareness

The issue of low voter turnout wasn't solely attributable to the new activation rule.A more fundamental problem was the lack of effective communication from the Bitcoin Foundation to its members. Well, the Bitcoin Foundation has around 1500 members, and of those members, only ones who have activated their membership are eligible to vote. The activation requirement was a new procedure that many members did not even know was required, which resulted in only 323 individuals voting in the election.Many members simply weren't aware of the election or the deadlines for registration and voting.

While dedicated emails were sent out on February 6th to notify members and encourage them to confirm their participation, the outreach clearly wasn't sufficient. And was approved by the Foundation Board on December the 16 th, 2025. Note: bg002h is Brian Goss, Chair of the Election Committee, and pmlaw is Patrick Murck, Executive Director of the Bitcoin Foundation. Dedicated emails went out on the 6 th of February to notify members to confirm themselves toThe fact that only 364 out of roughly 2,728 members registered to vote, as pointed out by candidate Jim Harper of the Cato Institute, is a testament to the communication challenges.

This communication breakdown can be attributed to several factors:

Information Overload: Members may be bombarded with information from various sources, making it difficult to filter out important updates from the Bitcoin Foundation.
Email Deliverability Issues: Emails may have been caught in spam filters or delivered to inactive email addresses.
Lack of Engagement: Members who are not actively engaged with the Bitcoin Foundation may be less likely to pay attention to its communications.

Addressing these communication challenges is crucial for improving voter turnout in future elections.The Bitcoin Foundation needs to explore alternative communication channels and strategies to ensure that all members are informed and engaged.

The Unsatisfactory Election Results and Their Implications

The combination of the new voting requirements and the communication breakdown resulted in an election with exceptionally low participation and, ultimately, unsatisfactory results. Candidates in the ongoing Bitcoin Foundation election to fill two vacant board of director positions have expressed concern at a low voter turnout. Candidate Jim Harper of the Cato Institute, and former global policy counsel for the foundation, has pointed out that only 364 of the organisation's roughly 2,728 members have registered to voteA vote to fill two vacant seats on the Board of Directors concluded without any candidate securing enough votes to be elected.

To be elected, candidates needed at least 52 votes. 1,159 Bitcoin Foundation Members Not Voting in Election . Only 23.9% of the potential voters are allowed to take part in the current board member election for the Bitcoin Foundation. A new ruleHowever, no candidate managed to reach this threshold.This outcome underscores the severity of the voter turnout problem.It raises concerns about the quality of representation and the ability of the Bitcoin Foundation to effectively govern itself.

The implications of this failed election are significant:

Lack of Leadership: The vacant board seats remain unfilled, potentially hindering the Bitcoin Foundation's ability to make important decisions and pursue its objectives.
Diminished Credibility: The low voter turnout and the failed election erode the credibility of the Bitcoin Foundation, both within the Bitcoin community and in the broader world.
Reduced Influence: A weak and ineffective Bitcoin Foundation has less influence on the development and adoption of Bitcoin.

Concerns Raised by Candidates and Community Members

The low voter turnout and the controversial election process have sparked considerable concern among candidates and community members.Candidates like Jim Harper and Bruce Fenton have publicly expressed their dissatisfaction with the way the election was conducted and communicated.

Fenton stated that he received multiple complaints from other Bitcoin Foundation members regarding the elections and the eligibility process. Both Fenton and Harper said they have received multiple complaints from other Bitcoin Foundation members about the elections and eligibility process. The problem was not so much the election procedure itself, Fenton said, but the way it was communicated to members. Efforts made Speaking to CoinDesk, Bitcoin Foundation director of communicationsHe emphasized that the issue wasn't necessarily the election procedure itself, but rather the way it was communicated to the members.

These concerns highlight the need for greater transparency and accountability in the Bitcoin Foundation's election process. Membership Sign Up Deadline for New Enrollment of Industry Members: Ma. If you are not already an industry member of the Bitcoin Foundation, you must become a member by Ma, to vote in this election. Details on becoming a member can be found here. Voting Begins: Week of ApMembers need to feel that their voices are being heard and that their participation matters.

The Abandoned Blockchain Voting Experiment

Adding another layer of complexity, the Bitcoin Foundation initially considered using blockchain technology for its voting system. A vote to fill the two vacant seats on the Bitcoin Foundation s Board of Directors has ended with no candidates garnering enough votes to secure a position.Candidates needed at least 52 votes to be elected to seat, however, no candidates passed this voting threshold, election results show.Though no candidates were elected, clear favorites for the position did emerge.BTC China CEO Bobby LeeThe idea was to leverage the transparency and security of the blockchain to ensure a fair and auditable election. Only 20% of the potential voters are allowed to take part in the current board member election for the Bitcoin Foundation. A new rule requiring voters to 'activate' their account was missed by up to 2,182 members, leading to their ineligibility to vote.However, this plan was ultimately abandoned due to concerns raised within the community.

These concerns centered around potential setbacks associated with blockchain voting.While the idea was innovative, the risks outweighed the potential benefits, leading the foundation to suspend voting by this method.This decision, though prudent, underscores the challenges of implementing new technologies in established organizations.

Possible Reasons Behind Member Disengagement

The low voter turnout points to a larger issue of member disengagement within the Bitcoin Foundation. Preview Mode. News Retail FX Institutional FX FintechSeveral factors could contribute to this lack of participation:

Perceived Irrelevance: Some members may feel that the Bitcoin Foundation is no longer relevant to the Bitcoin ecosystem or that its activities have little impact on their lives.
Lack of Trust: Members may lack trust in the Bitcoin Foundation's leadership or its decision-making processes.The resignations of prominent figures like Charlie Shrem and Mark Karpeles in the past could have contributed to this erosion of trust.
Time Constraints: Members may be too busy with other commitments to actively participate in the Bitcoin Foundation's activities.
Apathy: Some members may simply be apathetic and uninterested in participating in the organization's governance.

Addressing these underlying issues is crucial for revitalizing the Bitcoin Foundation and increasing member engagement. A vote to fill two vacant seats on the Bitcoin Foundation s Board of Directors has ended with no candidate garnering enough votes to secure a position. Candidates needed at least 52 votes to be elected to a seat, however, no-one passed this voting threshold, election results show.The foundation needs to demonstrate its value to its members and build trust through transparent and accountable governance.

Efforts Made to Address the Issue

Despite the challenges, the Bitcoin Foundation has made some efforts to address the issue of low voter turnout.Brian Goss, Chair of the Election Committee, thanked members for their participation in statements released to members and posted on the Bitcoin Foundation blog.

However, these efforts appear to have been insufficient to overcome the communication and engagement problems.More proactive and comprehensive measures are needed to ensure that all members are informed and motivated to participate in future elections.

The Bitcoin Foundation's Future: A Crossroads

The low voter turnout in the recent elections represents a critical juncture for the Bitcoin Foundation. influence the local bitcoin space. The Canadian Chapter of the Bitcoin Foundation (hereon referred to as Bitcoin Foundation Canada) recently elected two new members to its board of directors one to fill the Industry seat, and one to fill the Individual seat, with the election fully concluding this past week. Both new members have been metThe organization faces a choice: either address the underlying issues of communication, engagement, and relevance, or risk becoming increasingly marginalized within the Bitcoin ecosystem.

To revitalize itself, the Bitcoin Foundation needs to:

Improve Communication: Implement more effective communication strategies to ensure that all members are informed about important events and decisions.
Increase Engagement: Create more opportunities for members to participate in the organization's activities and contribute to its mission.
Enhance Transparency: Make the organization's governance processes more transparent and accountable.
Demonstrate Relevance: Clearly articulate the Bitcoin Foundation's value proposition and demonstrate its impact on the Bitcoin ecosystem.

The Bitcoin Foundation's ability to adapt and evolve will determine its future.If it can successfully address the challenges it faces, it has the potential to play a valuable role in shaping the future of Bitcoin. 26 votes, 24 comments. 5.9M subscribers in the Bitcoin community. Bitcoin is the currency of the Internet: a distributed, worldwide, decentralizedHowever, if it fails to adapt, it risks becoming irrelevant and fading into obscurity.

A Call to Action: Re-Engaging the Bitcoin Foundation Membership

The future of the Bitcoin Foundation hinges on the active participation of its members. Posted by u/dnivi3 - 44 votes and 24 commentsIt's crucial that the organization implements strategies to re-engage its membership and foster a sense of community. The Bitcoin Foundation was established in 2025, specifying the members' financial obligations denominated in bitcoin.The initial board of directors consisted of Gavin Andresen, Mark Karpeles, Jon Matonis, Patrick Murck, Charlie Shrem, and Peter Vessenes.This includes not only addressing the communication and process issues that led to low voter turnout but also providing compelling reasons for members to actively participate.

Here are some actionable steps the Bitcoin Foundation can take:

Conduct a Member Survey: Gather feedback from members to understand their concerns and identify areas for improvement.
Host Virtual Town Halls: Create opportunities for members to interact with board members and ask questions.
Develop Targeted Content: Provide valuable content that addresses the specific interests and needs of different member segments.
Recognize Member Contributions: Acknowledge and celebrate the contributions of active members to foster a sense of community and belonging.

By taking these steps, the Bitcoin Foundation can begin to rebuild trust, increase engagement, and ensure that its members have a meaningful voice in the organization's governance.

The Broader Implications for Decentralized Organizations

The challenges faced by the Bitcoin Foundation highlight the difficulties inherent in governing decentralized organizations. The new members are runners up from the previous industry election and the Bitcoin Foundation with the new appointments have also published a draft for a new mission statement. The press office of the Bitcoin Foundation has confirmed the appointment of Vinny Lingham, the co-founder and CEO of Gyft; Michael Perklin, president of C4; andMaintaining member engagement and ensuring democratic participation can be complex, especially as organizations grow and evolve.

The Bitcoin Foundation's experience offers valuable lessons for other decentralized organizations, particularly those operating in the cryptocurrency space. Over 10 members resigned from the Bitcoin Foundation over the recent election of Bitcoin entrepreneur Brock Pierce as its board director.These lessons include the importance of:

Clear and Consistent Communication: Establishing effective communication channels and ensuring that all members have access to timely and relevant information.
Simplified Processes: Streamlining governance processes and making it easy for members to participate in decision-making.
Strong Community Building: Fostering a sense of community and shared purpose to encourage active participation.
Adaptability: Being willing to adapt and evolve governance structures to meet the changing needs of the organization and its members.

Conclusion: The Path Forward for the Bitcoin Foundation

The story of the 1,159 Bitcoin Foundation members not voting in the election serves as a cautionary tale and a call to action. It could be that the Bitcoin Foundation has steered the elections to industry members only because most of the non-industry members are zombies. It would look pretty bad if only 24 individual members voted out of 1500. I think the Bitcoin Foundation needs to have a public roll call and remove any zombie member names from their web page.It highlights the importance of clear communication, engaging members, and ensuring transparent governance within decentralized organizations.The Bitcoin Foundation has the opportunity to learn from this experience and chart a new course towards greater participation and relevance.

Key takeaways include:

Communication is Paramount: The failure to adequately communicate the new voting requirements was a major contributing factor to the low voter turnout.
Engagement Drives Participation: Members who are actively engaged with the organization are more likely to participate in its governance.
Transparency Builds Trust: Transparent and accountable governance processes are essential for building trust and encouraging member participation.

The Bitcoin Foundation has a vital role to play in the ongoing development and adoption of Bitcoin. Bitcoin Daily Digest about Kim Dotcom's MegaNet Will Use Blockchain, PokerStars Denies BTC Rumors, Bitcoin Foundation Members, Commonwealth Secretariat to Explore Bitcoin, Stolen BTMs in AmsterdamBy addressing the challenges it faces and embracing a more inclusive and participatory approach, the organization can reclaim its position as a leading voice in the cryptocurrency community.The future of the Bitcoin Foundation depends on it.