A16Z VOTES AGAINST PROPOSAL TO DEPLOY UNISWAP V3 ON BNB CHAIN

Last updated: June 20, 2025, 01:29 | Written by: Brian Kelly

A16Z Votes Against Proposal To Deploy Uniswap V3 On Bnb Chain
A16Z Votes Against Proposal To Deploy Uniswap V3 On Bnb Chain

The world of decentralized finance (DeFi) is constantly evolving, with governance proposals playing a crucial role in shaping the future of protocols like Uniswap.Recently, a significant governance proposal aimed to deploy Uniswap V3 on the BNB Chain, a fast and low-cost blockchain network, sparked considerable debate within the crypto community. Own this piece of history. Venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz (a16z) voted against a final proposal to deploy Uniswap V3 on the BNB Chain using the Wormhole bridge, shows the Uniswap DAO forum.The proposal, submitted by 0xPlasma Labs on behalf of the Uniswap Community, sought to leverage the Wormhole bridge for cross-chain communication. The governance proposal to deploy the latest Uniswap iteration on the BNB Chain was submitted on Feb. 2 by 0xPlasma Labs on behalf of the Uniswap Community, after it passed a temperature check with 20 million (80.28%) votes for yes, and 4.9 million (19.72%) votes for no.While the proposal initially passed a temperature check with strong support, it faced a major hurdle when venture capital giant Andreessen Horowitz, better known as a16z, cast its substantial voting power against the initiative. The venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz (a16z) has against 1 final proposal voted to deploy Uniswap v3 on the BNB Chain using the Wormhole bridge. Vote against proposal 0xPlasma Labs submitted the board proposal on February 2 on behalf of the Uniswap community to deploy the latest Uniswap iteration on the BNB blockchain. This proposal [ ]This move has ignited discussions about the power of large token holders in decentralized governance, the selection process for cross-chain bridges, and the potential benefits and drawbacks of expanding Uniswap's reach to alternative blockchain ecosystems. The proposal to deploy Uniswap v3 on BNB Chain will go forward to the final governance vote with Wormhole as the selected bridge. Delegates, as always, will have the opportunity to vote for or against the proposal in this final vote, based on their view of which choice is best for Uniswap. Timeframe and Context on Bridge Selection Temperature CheckLet's delve into the details of this pivotal vote and explore the implications for Uniswap and the wider DeFi landscape.

The Uniswap V3 on BNB Chain Proposal: An Overview

The proposal to deploy Uniswap V3 on the BNB Chain was driven by the desire to broaden Uniswap's user base and tap into the growing DeFi ecosystem on BNB Chain.The BNB Chain, formerly Binance Smart Chain, offers faster transaction speeds and lower gas fees compared to Ethereum, potentially attracting users who are priced out of using Uniswap on the Ethereum mainnet. a16z votes against proposal to deploy Uniswap V3 on BNB Chain⁣ deploy uniswap vote bnbs proposalsThis deployment aimed to make Uniswap more accessible and competitive in the broader DeFi market.

Why BNB Chain?

  • Lower Transaction Fees: BNB Chain boasts significantly lower transaction fees compared to Ethereum, making it more affordable for users with smaller trading volumes.
  • Faster Transaction Speeds: BNB Chain offers faster block times, resulting in quicker transaction confirmations.
  • Growing DeFi Ecosystem: The BNB Chain ecosystem has a vibrant and expanding range of DeFi applications, creating potential synergies for Uniswap.

The proposal selected Wormhole as the bridge to connect Uniswap V3 on BNB Chain back to Ethereum. Venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz (a16z) voted against a final proposal to deploy Uniswap V3 on the BNB Chain using the Wormhole bridge, shows the Uniswap DAO forum.Wormhole is an interoperability protocol designed to facilitate the transfer of assets and data between different blockchain networks.

A16z's Opposition: A Detailed Look

Andreessen Horowitz (a16z), a prominent venture capital firm with a significant stake in Uniswap, used its 15 million UNI token voting block to vote against the proposal.This substantial voting power effectively swayed the outcome of the vote, highlighting the influence that large token holders can exert in decentralized governance systems. While the vote on the proposal to deploy Uniswap V3 to BNB Chain is in full swing, a16z's vote against the proposal has attracted a lot of attention from the crypto community.Last December, the 0xPlasma Labs founder released a draft proposal to deploy Uniswap V3 to BNB Chain. The proposal stated that since Uniswap's BUSL license expires in April of this year, it would be beneficial to deployA16z's decision wasn't arbitrary; they articulated specific reasons for their opposition, which centered around the bridge selection process.

According to a16z, the selection of a bridge provider for cross-chain governance messaging should be a comprehensive and structured process.They argued that the process should allow for equal comparative analysis between each option and claimed this didn’t fully occur.A16z voiced their support for LayerZero as an alternative bridge solution, stating that they had reviewed various bridge proposals and evaluated each, ultimately concluding that LayerZero was the superior choice.

The Bridge Dilemma: Wormhole vs. Venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz (a16z) voted against a final proposal to deploy Uniswap V3 on the BNB Chain using the Wormhole bridge.LayerZero

The core of a16z's opposition lies in the choice of Wormhole as the bridge connecting Uniswap V3 on BNB Chain to Ethereum. Venture capital firm a16z voted against a governance proposal on Friday that, if passed, would deploy Uniswap V3 to Binance s BNB Chain, connected to Ethereum via the cross-chain bridging solution Wormhole. The vote is active for a total of one week, ending Feb. 10. Wormhole, initially created by Certus One, is an interoperability protocolWhile Wormhole has been a popular choice for cross-chain communication, it has also faced security concerns in the past.This history likely influenced a16z's decision to advocate for LayerZero.

Wormhole: Strengths and Weaknesses

  • Strengths:
    • Established interoperability protocol
    • Wide adoption across various blockchain networks
  • Weaknesses:
    • Past security breaches
    • Concerns about centralization

LayerZero: A Contender for Cross-Chain Interoperability

LayerZero is a relatively newer interoperability protocol that aims to provide secure and efficient cross-chain communication. Venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz (a16z) voted against a final proposal to deploy Uniswap V3 on the BNB Chain usingIt utilizes a different architectural approach compared to Wormhole, focusing on minimizing trust assumptions and enhancing security.

  • Key Features:
    • Uses oracles and relays for cross-chain message verification
    • Designed to minimize trust in intermediaries
    • Focus on security and efficiency

The Impact of A16z's Vote on Uniswap Governance

A16z's vote against the Uniswap V3 on BNB Chain proposal underscores the complexities and challenges of decentralized governance.While the ideal of a DAO (Decentralized Autonomous Organization) is to empower the community, the reality is that large token holders often wield significant influence.This raises questions about whether true decentralization is achievable in practice.

Decentralized Governance: A Balancing Act

Decentralized governance aims to distribute decision-making power among token holders, allowing them to collectively shape the future of a protocol. If the proposal had passed, Uniswap V3 would have been hosted on the Binance Smart Chain, a fast and low-cost blockchain network. This could have attracted more users to the platform, increasingHowever, the concentration of tokens in the hands of a few large entities can lead to situations where their votes effectively determine the outcome of proposals, regardless of the broader community sentiment.

Potential Solutions for a More Balanced Governance

  • Quadratic Voting: This voting mechanism gives more weight to individual voters by increasing the cost of each additional vote.
  • Delegated Voting: Allows token holders to delegate their voting power to trusted representatives who are knowledgeable about the protocol.
  • Time-Weighted Voting: Rewards long-term token holders with more voting power.

What Does This Mean for Uniswap Users?

The immediate impact of a16z's vote is that Uniswap V3 will not be deployed on the BNB Chain, at least not using the Wormhole bridge.This means that users who were hoping to access Uniswap's functionality with lower fees and faster transaction times on BNB Chain will have to wait longer, or potentially explore alternative decentralized exchanges on that network.

Alternative DEXs on BNB Chain

  • PancakeSwap: A popular decentralized exchange native to BNB Chain, offering similar features to Uniswap.
  • Biswap: Another prominent DEX on BNB Chain, known for its low fees and referral program.

However, the debate surrounding the bridge selection process is likely to continue.The Uniswap community may explore alternative bridge solutions, such as LayerZero, or revisit the Wormhole option after further security audits and assessments.

The Future of Cross-Chain Expansion for Uniswap

Despite the setback with the BNB Chain proposal, the desire to expand Uniswap's reach to other blockchain networks remains strong. The governance proposal to deploy the latest Uniswap iteration on the BNB Chain was submitted on Feb. 2 by 0xPlasma Labs on behalf of the Uniswap Community, after it passed a temperature checkCross-chain expansion is a key strategy for increasing Uniswap's user base, liquidity, and overall market share.The protocol is likely to continue exploring different options for deploying its technology on other chains, while carefully considering the security and governance implications.

Potential Future Chains for Uniswap Deployment

  • Polygon: A layer-2 scaling solution for Ethereum, offering faster and cheaper transactions.
  • Arbitrum: Another popular Ethereum layer-2 scaling solution.
  • Optimism: An optimistic rollup solution also built on Ethereum.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Why is cross-chain interoperability important for DeFi?

Cross-chain interoperability is crucial for DeFi because it allows users to seamlessly move assets and data between different blockchain networks. Hey all, we ve (a16z) reviewed the various bridge proposals, evaluated each, and strongly support LayerZero. We re unable to vote in the current Snapshot due to infrastructure limitations with the custodian on short notice, but we will be participating in the on-chain vote when it goes live, in addition to any new Snapshot votes that may come up.This unlocks new opportunities for composability, liquidity aggregation, and ultimately, a more efficient and interconnected DeFi ecosystem.

What are the risks associated with cross-chain bridges?

Cross-chain bridges are complex and often involve centralized components, making them potential targets for hacks and exploits. Venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz (a16z) voted against a final proposal to deploy Uniswap v3 on the BNB Chain using the Wormhole bridge, the Uniswap DAO forum shows. The governance proposal to deploy the latest Uniswap iteration on the BNB Chain was submitted on Feb. 2 by 0xPlasma Labs on beA vulnerability in a bridge can lead to the loss of funds and disruption of services across multiple blockchain networks.This is why thorough security audits and robust risk management are essential for any cross-chain solution.

How does a16z's voting power impact Uniswap governance?

A16z's significant UNI token holdings give them substantial voting power in Uniswap governance.This allows them to influence the outcome of proposals, potentially aligning the protocol's development with their own interests.While their expertise and insights can be valuable, it also raises concerns about the potential for centralized control within a decentralized system.

What is the Uniswap BUSL license, and why is it expiring?

The Uniswap Business Source License (BUSL) is a software license that grants exclusive commercial use of the Uniswap V3 source code for a limited period.After the license expires, the code becomes freely available for anyone to use, modify, and distribute, potentially leading to increased competition and innovation in the decentralized exchange space. The venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz (a16z) has against 1 final proposal voted to deploy Uniswap v3 on the BNB Chain using the Wormhole bridge. Vote against proposal 0xPlasma Labs submitted the board proposal on February 2 on behalf of the Uniswap community to deploy the latest Uniswap iteration on the BNB blockchain.The expiration of the BUSL license in April was cited as a reason to deploy on other chains.

Conclusion: Key Takeaways and the Future of Uniswap

The a16z vote against the Uniswap V3 on BNB Chain proposal serves as a reminder of the complexities and challenges inherent in decentralized governance. Venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz (a16z) voted against a final proposal to deploy Uniswap V3 on the BNB Chain using the Wormhole bridge, shows the Uniswap DAO forum.The governanceWhile the proposal initially garnered strong support, the concerns raised by a16z regarding the bridge selection process ultimately swayed the outcome.This event highlights the importance of thorough security assessments, transparent decision-making, and ongoing dialogue within the Uniswap community.As Uniswap continues to evolve, it will be crucial to address the power dynamics within its governance system and explore innovative solutions that promote more balanced and equitable participation. While the vote on the proposal to deploy Uniswap V3 to BNB Chain is in full swing, a16z's vote against the proposal has attracted a lot of attention from the crypto community. Last December, the 0xPlasma Labs founder released a draft proposal to deploy Uniswap V3 to BNB Chain.The future of cross-chain expansion for Uniswap remains bright, but careful consideration of security, governance, and community input will be essential for success.

Ultimately, the decision to deploy Uniswap V3 on other chains, including BNB Chain, rests with the Uniswap community.It is important to stay informed, participate in discussions, and exercise your voting rights to shape the future of this important DeFi protocol.

Actionable Advice: Stay updated with Uniswap governance proposals and actively participate in the discussions and voting processes. The venture firm used its 15 million UNI holding against the deployment using the Wormhole bridge. Venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz (a16z) voted against a final proposal to deploy Uniswap V3 on the BNB Chain using the Wormhole bridge, shows the Uniswap DAO forum.Your voice matters!

Brian Kelly can be reached at [email protected].

Articles tagged with "Warba Bank enters the world of Metaverse - UNLOCK" (0 found)

No articles found with this tag.

← Back to article

Related Tags

cointelegraph.com › news › a16z-votes-againsta16z votes against proposal to deploy Uniswap v3 on BNB Chain www.theblock.co › post › A16z votes against proposal to deploy latest Uniswap blockworks.co › news › a16z-delegated-to-group-thatA16z Delegated to Group that Opposed Its Vote on Uniswap for cryptopotato.com › a16z-exerts-control-overA16z Exerts Control Over Uniswap by Downvoting BNB Chain blofin.com › en › newsWhy Did a16z Vote Against Uniswap's Latest Expansion? - BloFin gov.uniswap.org › t › rfc-update-deploy-uniswap-v3-1[RFC - Update] Deploy Uniswap v3 (1 / 0.3 / 0.05 / 0.01) on tokeninsight.com › en › newsWhy Did a16z Vote Against Uniswap's Latest Expansion? mtrushmorecrypto.com › a16z-votes-against-proposala16z votes against proposal to deploy Uniswap v3 on BNB Chain cryptonews.net › news › altcoinsa16z votes against proposal to deploy Uniswap V3 on BNB Chain www.binance.com › en-NG › squareA16z Votes Against Proposal to Deploy Uniswap V3 on BNB Chain www.youtube.com › watcha16z votes against proposal to deploy Uniswap V3 on BNB Chain www.binance.com › en-AE › squareA16z Votes Against Proposal to Deploy Uniswap V3 on BNB Chain www.linkedin.com › pulse › a16z-votes-againstA16z votes against proposal to deploy Uniswap v3 on BNB Chain altszn.com › a16z-votes-against-proposal-to-deploya16z votes against proposal to deploy Uniswap V3 on BNB Chain www.tradingview.com › news › cointelegraph:3e826d96fa16z votes against proposal to deploy Uniswap v3 on BNB Chain www.binance.com › en › squareA16z Votes Against Proposal to Deploy Uniswap V3 on BNB Chain www.binance.com › ar › squareA16z Votes Against Proposal to Deploy Uniswap V3 on BNB Chain hoonationbullishcrypto.com › a16z-votes-againsta16z votes against proposal to deploy Uniswap v3 on BNB Chain themarketscafe.com › a16z-votes-against-proposala16z votes against proposal to deploy Uniswap V3 on BNB Chain mrcryptoearnings.com › a16z-votes-against-proposala16z votes against proposal to deploy Uniswap v3 on BNB Chain

Comments