ANOTHER CRYPTO FIRM HIT WITH FINES FOR VIOLATING U.S. SANCTIONS

Last updated: June 19, 2025, 19:58 | Written by: Elizabeth Rossiello

The cryptocurrency industry, once seen as a haven from traditional financial oversight, is facing increasing scrutiny from U.S. regulators.In 2025 alone, fines levied against crypto and fintech firms for inadequate controls surpassed those imposed on the entire traditional financial sector.This surge in enforcement actions underscores a global crackdown on illicit money flows, with regulators sending a clear message to payment firms: compliance with anti-money laundering (AML) and sanctions regulations is non-negotiable. OFAC s sanctions blocked all Tornado Cash property in the U.S. and prohibited transactions involving the platform, highlighting the need for robust AML and sanctions compliance in crypto. Binance (2025): On Novem, OFAC fined Binance Holdings, Ltd. $968.6 million for 1.6 million violations of U.S. sanctions programs. Over fiveThe most recent example of this trend is the growing list of crypto firms facing hefty penalties for violating U.S. sanctions, demonstrating the serious consequences of failing to implement robust Know Your Customer (KYC) procedures and neglecting to prevent transactions with sanctioned entities. Binance Holdings Ltd and its Chief Executive Officer Changpeng Zhao pleaded guilty to anti-money laundering and US sanctions violations under a sweeping settlement with the US that allows the cryptocurrency exchange to continue operating.These violations not only carry significant financial repercussions but also damage a company's reputation and erode trust in the broader cryptocurrency ecosystem.As the U.S.Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) intensifies its efforts to combat financial crime, crypto businesses must prioritize compliance to avoid becoming the next target.

The Growing Trend of Crypto Sanctions Violations

Recent months have witnessed a concerning trend of cryptocurrency companies facing substantial fines for breaching U.S. sanctions.These cases highlight a systemic failure to prevent sanctioned individuals and entities from accessing and utilizing crypto platforms, enabling illicit activities and undermining national security efforts. Crypto and fintech firms faced more fines for inadequate controls than the entire traditional financial sector in 2025. Global authorities are cracking down on illicit money flows. Regulators are sending a strong message to payment firms.Several high-profile cases have brought this issue to the forefront.

Binance's Landmark Settlement

One of the most significant examples is the case of Binance, the world's largest cryptocurrency exchange. Furthermore, OFAC has not only initiated enforcement actions against crypto companies found violating U.S. sanctions but has also imposed sanctions on crypto exchanges and entities within the crypto ecosystem that are perceived as threats to U.S. national security and foreign policy interests.In a landmark settlement, Binance Holdings Ltd and its Chief Executive Officer Changpeng Zhao pleaded guilty to anti-money laundering and U.S. sanctions violations. Primary sanctions generally apply to US persons or to situations where there is a US nexus (such as the involvement of a US person, US-originating goods or transactions that take place within US borders). Secondary sanctions authorize OFAC or the US State Department to threaten sanctions on a person - even a non-US citizen - for a specifiedThis sweeping agreement, totaling over $4 billion, allows Binance to continue operating under heightened scrutiny.Zhao also agreed to step down from his role, signaling a major shift in leadership and a renewed commitment to compliance.

The Penalties: Binance was fined $968.6 million by OFAC for 1.6 million violations of U.S. sanctions programs.
The Violations: These violations stemmed from the exchange's failure to implement adequate KYC and AML controls, allowing users in sanctioned regions to access its services.

KuCoin's Legal Troubles

Adding to the mounting pressure, Peken Global Ltd, one of the companies operating the KuCoin exchange, pleaded guilty in a Manhattan federal court. Today s alert the second in our Sanctions 2025 Year in Review Series provides an overview of U.S. sanctions enforcement in 2025, including the key lessons learned from the public enforcement actions issued by the U.S. Department of the Treasury s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC).The company was ordered to pay a staggering $113 million in fines and forfeit an additional $184.5 million. On Monday, Peken Global Ltd, one of the three companies that run KuCoin, pleaded guilty in a Manhattan federal court. US District, Judge Andrew Carter, presided over the case, where the company was ordered to pay $113 million as a fine and forfeit another $184.5 million.This case underscores the potential for severe financial penalties when crypto firms fail to adhere to U.S. sanctions regulations.

OKX's $504 Million Penalty

Another cryptocurrency exchange, OKX, also faced legal repercussions, pleading guilty in federal court for failing to prevent criminals from using its services.The exchange agreed to pay a hefty $504 million in penalties, further emphasizing the zero-tolerance policy towards sanctions violations.

Understanding OFAC and U.S. The SEC hit the crypto exchange Kraken with a $360,000 fine last year for allegedly violating US sanctions against Iran and later fined the exchange an additional $30 million for sellingSanctions

The U.S. The firm may have violated US sanctions, according to the Times report, by allowing users in Iran, Cuba and Syria to buy and sell digital assets. The Treasury Department Office of Foreign Assets Control is handling the investigation. Kraken would be the largest American crypto firm to be hit by enforcement action by the office.Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) plays a crucial role in administering and enforcing economic and trade sanctions based on U.S. foreign policy and national security goals.These sanctions are designed to counter a wide range of threats, including:

Terrorist financing
Proliferation of weapons of mass destruction
Human rights abuses
International narcotics trafficking

OFAC sanctions can take various forms, including:

Blocking Assets: Freezing the assets of designated individuals and entities (Specially Designated Nationals or SDNs)
Prohibiting Transactions: Restricting U.S. persons (including companies) from engaging in transactions with sanctioned individuals, entities, and countries.

The implications for crypto firms are significant. The data, compiled by compliance software provider Fenergo, showed that total fines for money laundering and other financial crime violations rose more than 30 per cent to $6.6bn, but remainedThey must ensure that they are not directly or indirectly facilitating transactions with sanctioned parties. Binance chief executive Changpeng Zhao agreed to step down from his role on Tuesday and plead guilty to anti-money laundering and sanctions violations as part of a $4 billion settlementThis restriction also extends to exchanges that indirectly benefit SDNs. The U.S. Department of the Treasury s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) administers and enforces economic and trade sanctions against targeted foreign jurisdictions and regimes, as well as individuals and entities engaging in harmful activity, such as terrorists, international narcotics traffickers, weapons of mass destruction proliferators, and other malign actors, in response toEven transacting with entities 50% or more owned by an SDN can result in significant penalties.

Key Reasons for Sanctions Violations in the Crypto Space

Several factors contribute to sanctions violations within the cryptocurrency industry. BitMEX was fined $100 million Wednesday for U.S. money-laundering violations after a years-long court battle. In 2025, founders Arthur Hayes and Benjamin Delo pleaded guilty to similar charges and paid $10 million in fines. The US government requested that the court dismiss all open counts against the crypto exchange at sentencing.These include:

Inadequate KYC and AML Procedures: Weak or non-existent KYC and AML programs make it easier for sanctioned individuals and entities to evade detection and access crypto services.
Lack of Sanctions Screening: Failure to screen users and transactions against OFAC's sanctions lists allows prohibited activity to slip through the cracks.
Decentralized Nature of Crypto: The pseudonymous and borderless nature of cryptocurrencies can make it challenging to track transactions and identify participants.
Limited Resources and Expertise: Some crypto firms, particularly smaller ones, may lack the resources and expertise necessary to implement robust compliance programs.
Ambiguous Regulatory Landscape: The evolving regulatory landscape surrounding cryptocurrencies can create confusion and uncertainty, making it difficult for firms to stay compliant.

The Consequences of Non-Compliance

The consequences of violating U.S. sanctions can be severe, ranging from hefty fines to reputational damage and even criminal charges.Some potential consequences include:

Significant Financial Penalties: As demonstrated by the cases of Binance, KuCoin, and OKX, fines can reach hundreds of millions or even billions of dollars.
Reputational Damage: Sanctions violations can severely damage a company's reputation, eroding trust among users and investors.
Criminal Charges: Individuals involved in sanctions violations can face criminal charges, potentially leading to imprisonment.
Asset Forfeiture: OFAC may seize assets linked to sanctions violations.
Loss of Access to the U.S.Financial System: Companies that violate sanctions may be barred from accessing the U.S. financial system, severely limiting their ability to operate.
Enhanced Regulatory Scrutiny: Firms that have violated sanctions can expect increased scrutiny from regulators, potentially leading to more frequent audits and investigations.

Building a Robust Sanctions Compliance Program

To mitigate the risk of sanctions violations, crypto firms must implement robust compliance programs. The U.S. sanctions authority fines another crypto company for failure to implement proper KYC and, as a result, servicing users in sanctioned areas.These programs should include the following key elements:

1.Comprehensive KYC and AML Procedures

Implementing strong KYC and AML procedures is the cornerstone of sanctions compliance.This involves:

Customer Due Diligence (CDD): Collecting and verifying customer information, including identity, address, and source of funds.
Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD): Conducting more thorough investigations for high-risk customers, such as those from sanctioned countries or involved in high-risk activities.
Transaction Monitoring: Monitoring transactions for suspicious activity, such as large or unusual transactions, transactions to or from sanctioned countries, and transactions involving high-risk counterparties.

2.Sanctions Screening

Regularly screening users and transactions against OFAC's sanctions lists is essential. The .gov means it s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you re on a federal government site.This involves:

Name Screening: Screening customer names against the Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (SDN List).
Transaction Screening: Screening transactions for any connection to sanctioned individuals, entities, or countries.
Geographic Screening: Identifying and restricting access to users from sanctioned countries.

3.Risk Assessment

Conducting regular risk assessments helps identify and evaluate potential sanctions risks.This involves:

Identifying Risk Factors: Identifying factors that could increase the risk of sanctions violations, such as the firm's customer base, geographic reach, and product offerings.
Evaluating Risk Exposure: Assessing the potential impact of sanctions violations on the firm.
Developing Mitigation Strategies: Implementing controls to mitigate identified risks.

4.Training and Education

Providing regular training and education to employees on sanctions compliance is crucial. Cryptocurrency exchange Bittrex has been fined $29 million by the Treasury Department for violating U.S. sanctions and anti-money laundering laws, the largest penalty ever levied against a cryptoThis ensures that employees understand their responsibilities and can identify and report suspicious activity.

5.Independent Audits

Conducting independent audits of the compliance program helps identify weaknesses and ensure its effectiveness.

6.Reporting Suspicious Activity

Filing Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs) with the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) is a critical component of sanctions compliance.SARs provide law enforcement with valuable information about potential financial crimes, including sanctions violations.

Technological Solutions for Sanctions Compliance

Fortunately, various technological solutions can assist crypto firms in meeting their sanctions compliance obligations.These solutions include:

Sanctions Screening Software: Automates the process of screening users and transactions against OFAC's sanctions lists.
Transaction Monitoring Systems: Monitor transactions for suspicious activity and generate alerts for further investigation.
KYC/AML Platforms: Provide comprehensive solutions for customer due diligence, transaction monitoring, and sanctions screening.
Blockchain Analytics Tools: Help trace the flow of funds on the blockchain and identify potential links to sanctioned entities.

The Role of Regulators in Ensuring Compliance

Regulators play a vital role in ensuring compliance with sanctions regulations. Cryptocurrency exchange OKX pled guilty in federal court to failing to prevent criminals from using its services, agreeing to pay $504 million in penalties.This involves:

Issuing Guidance: Providing clear guidance to crypto firms on their compliance obligations.
Conducting Examinations: Conducting regular examinations of crypto firms to assess their compliance with sanctions regulations.
Enforcing Regulations: Taking enforcement actions against firms that violate sanctions regulations.

OFAC's enforcement actions against crypto firms demonstrate the agency's commitment to holding the industry accountable for compliance with U.S. sanctions. The SEC has formally dropped its lawsuit against Binance and founder Changpeng Zhao, ending one of the last crypto enforcement actions by the agency.These actions serve as a warning to other firms that failure to comply will result in significant consequences.

The Future of Crypto Sanctions Compliance

As the cryptocurrency industry continues to evolve, sanctions compliance will become even more critical.Several trends are likely to shape the future of crypto sanctions compliance:

Increased Regulatory Scrutiny: Regulators around the world are likely to increase their scrutiny of the crypto industry, focusing on sanctions compliance and other financial crime risks.
Greater Use of Technology: Crypto firms will increasingly rely on technology to automate and enhance their compliance efforts.
Enhanced Collaboration: Collaboration between regulators, law enforcement agencies, and the crypto industry will be essential to combat financial crime.
Expanding Sanctions Regimes: The scope of sanctions regimes is likely to expand, requiring crypto firms to adapt their compliance programs accordingly.

Common Questions about Crypto Sanctions

What are the primary sanctions risks for crypto firms?

The primary sanctions risks for crypto firms include facilitating transactions with sanctioned individuals and entities, enabling illicit activities such as money laundering and terrorist financing, and undermining national security efforts. The Treasury s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is a U.S division responsible for administering and enforcing economic and trade sanctions based on U.S. foreign policy and national security goals. OFAC sanctions are designed to counter terrorist financing, proliferation, human rights abuses, and other threats to international security.Failing to implement adequate KYC and AML procedures and neglecting to screen users and transactions against OFAC's sanctions lists significantly increase these risks.

What are the key elements of a robust sanctions compliance program?

A robust sanctions compliance program should include comprehensive KYC and AML procedures, regular sanctions screening, risk assessments, employee training and education, independent audits, and procedures for reporting suspicious activity.Employing technological solutions such as sanctions screening software, transaction monitoring systems, and blockchain analytics tools is also essential.

How can crypto firms stay up-to-date on evolving sanctions regulations?

Crypto firms can stay up-to-date on evolving sanctions regulations by regularly monitoring OFAC's website for updates and guidance, participating in industry events and webinars, consulting with legal and compliance experts, and subscribing to relevant news and publications. This report reviews the most notable sanctions violation penalties from 2025. It was an astonishing year that sent jitters through the spines of many in the global sanctions community. Regulators dished out billions of dollars in fines for compliance failings by Microsoft, British American Tobacco (BAT), Deutsche Bank, Binance, and many more.Staying informed about regulatory changes is crucial for maintaining compliance.

What should a crypto firm do if it discovers a potential sanctions violation?

If a crypto firm discovers a potential sanctions violation, it should immediately investigate the matter, assess the extent of the violation, and take corrective action to prevent future violations.The firm should also consult with legal counsel and consider voluntarily disclosing the violation to OFAC.Cooperation with authorities can mitigate potential penalties.

Conclusion: Prioritizing Compliance in the Crypto Age

The increasing number of crypto firms facing fines for violating U.S. sanctions serves as a stark reminder that compliance is no longer optional. Binance Holdings Limited (Binance), the entity that operates the world s largest cryptocurrency exchange, Binance.com, pleaded guilty today and has agreed to pay over $4 billion to resolve the Justice Department s investigation into violations related to the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA), failure to register as a money transmitting business, and the International Emergency EconomicThe landscape is shifting, and regulators are showing they are serious about enforcement.As global authorities continue to crack down on illicit money flows, cryptocurrency businesses must prioritize compliance with AML and sanctions regulations to avoid severe financial penalties, reputational damage, and potential criminal charges. The restriction on these transactions also includes exchanges that indirectly benefit SDNs. That means that if an SDN or blocked entity is involved or benefits from a cryptocurrency transaction is executed, the crypto firm could face fines and penalties. Even transacting with entities 50% or more owned by an SDN will result in a sanctionsBy implementing robust KYC and AML procedures, investing in technological solutions, and staying informed about evolving regulations, crypto firms can navigate the complex regulatory landscape and protect themselves from the consequences of non-compliance. Failure to do so will not only put their businesses at risk but also undermine trust in the entire cryptocurrency ecosystem. The message is clear: Compliance is not a cost; it's an investment in the long-term sustainability and integrity of the crypto industry. Take action today to ensure your firm is meeting its compliance obligations and contributing to a safer and more secure financial future.