ARAGON OPPOSES CHANGE TO ETHEREUMS MINING ALGORITHM BEFORE 2.0 VERSION

Last updated: June 19, 2025, 23:51 | Written by: Anthony Di Iorio

The Ethereum blockchain, a cornerstone of the decentralized world, has been undergoing a significant transformation. Paris was The Merge transition - its major feature was switching off the proof-of-work mining algorithm and associated consensus logic and switching on proof-of-stake instead. Paris itself was an upgrade to the execution clients (equivalent to Bellatrix on the consensus layer) that enabled them to take instruction from their connected consensusA pivotal aspect of this evolution is the planned transition from a Proof-of-Work (PoW) consensus mechanism to a Proof-of-Stake (PoS) model with the advent of Ethereum 2.0 (now referred to as the consensus layer upgrade). ANT holders who vote yes on this proposal oppose Ethereum changing its proof-of-work mining algorithm before the switch to proof-of-stake as part of the Ethereum 2.0 roll-out, unless such change is intended as an emergency fix to a fatal flaw in the current mining algorithm.However, proposals to alter the current PoW mining algorithm before the full rollout of Ethereum 2.0 have sparked considerable debate within the community. Aragon Opposes Change to Ethereum's Mining Algorithm Before 2.0 Version. Aragon Opposes Change to Ethereum's Mining Algorithm Before 2.0 Version. Kane Dane November 5One notable instance of this is the discussion surrounding ProgPOW, a proposed protocol change designed to reduce the efficiency advantage held by specialized mining hardware known as ASICs (Application-Specific Integrated Circuits).The Aragon community, a decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) focused on providing tools for DAO creation and management, has weighed in on this debate, expressing strong opposition to any changes to the Ethereum mining algorithm before the complete implementation of Ethereum 2.0, unless such change is intended as an emergency fix to a fatal flaw in the current mining algorithm.This stance reflects broader concerns about the potential disruptions and uncertainties associated with modifying the mining algorithm during this critical transition period.

This article delves into the Aragon community's decision to oppose algorithm changes like ProgPOW, explores the reasoning behind their stance, and examines the implications for the Ethereum network and its future.We will also look at the Ethereum 2.0 upgrade and mining and staking.

Understanding ProgPOW and its Intended Purpose

ProgPOW, short for ""Programmatic Proof-of-Work,"" was a proposed algorithm change intended to level the playing field in Ethereum mining. Aragon Opposes Change to Ethereum's Mining Algorithm Before 2.0 VersionCurrently, ASICs, which are specialized hardware designed specifically for mining Ethereum, have a significant efficiency advantage over general-purpose GPUs (Graphics Processing Units).This advantage concentrates mining power in the hands of a few entities that can afford to invest in ASICs, potentially leading to centralization concerns within the Ethereum network.The core idea behind ProgPOW was to make Ethereum mining more accessible to GPU miners, thus promoting decentralization by making it more difficult for ASICs to dominate the mining landscape.

The Debate Around ProgPOW: Centralization vs. { payload :{ allShortcutsEnabled :false, fileTree :{ AGPs :{ items :[{ name : AGP-0.md, path : AGPs/AGP-0.md, contentType : file },{ name : AGP-1.md, path : AGPsStability

While the goal of ProgPOW was laudable – promoting greater decentralization – it also sparked considerable controversy.Critics raised concerns about the potential for instability and the risks associated with changing the mining algorithm so close to the planned transition to Ethereum 2.0. ProgPOW would change the Ethereum network s proof-of-work mining algorithm before the eventual switch to a proof-of-stake model as part of the Ethereum 2.0 roll-out.Furthermore, there were debates about the effectiveness of ProgPOW in truly preventing ASIC dominance, as it was argued that ASICs could potentially adapt to the new algorithm over time. The Aragon community has officially proclaimed itself against ProgPOW. ProgPOW is a proposed protocol change to the Ehereum network that would close the efficiency gap available toThis led the Aragon community to consider whether the benefits of ProgPOW outweighed the potential risks and disruptions.

Aragon's Stance: Prioritizing Stability and the Ethereum 2.0 Transition

The Aragon community, known for its commitment to decentralized governance and careful consideration of potential impacts, ultimately voted against implementing any changes to Ethereum's mining algorithm before the arrival of Ethereum 2.0. p Aragon votes against Ethereum changing its proof-of-work mining algorithm before Ethereum 2.0 /p Aragon Opposes Change to Ethereum's Mining Algorithm Before 2.0 Version - Sharecast.com SharecastThis decision was rooted in the belief that introducing such a change would introduce unnecessary risk and complexity during a period of significant transformation for the Ethereum network.

In October, Aragon introduced their community voting service, Aragon Network, where Aragon (ANT) token holders could vote on proposals, including the one regarding changes to the Ethereum mining algorithm. Arag n, que es un proyecto de software de c digo abierto para la creaci n y gesti n de organizaciones aut nomas descentralizadas (DAOs), utiliza contratos inteligentes de Ethereum. En octubre, Aragon anunci su ltima votaci n en Aragon Network, en la que los titulares de tokens de Aragon pudieron emitir sus votos sobre una variedad deAlmost 860,000 tokens voted yes on the proposal to oppose any change.

Key Considerations for the Aragon Community

Stability Concerns: The Aragon community placed a high value on the stability of the Ethereum network, especially given the imminent transition to Proof-of-Stake.They believed that introducing a new mining algorithm could create unforeseen vulnerabilities or bugs, potentially jeopardizing the smooth rollout of Ethereum 2.0.
Transition Costs: Implementing ProgPOW would require significant development and testing efforts, diverting resources that could be better allocated to the Ethereum 2.0 transition.
Uncertainty: There was uncertainty about the long-term effectiveness of ProgPOW in achieving its goals.Some argued that ASICs could adapt to the new algorithm, negating its intended benefits.
Emergency Fix Exception: ANT holders voted yes on the proposal to oppose Ethereum changing its proof-of-work mining algorithm before the switch to proof-of-stake as part of the Ethereum 2.0 roll-out, unless such change is intended as an emergency fix to a fatal flaw in the current mining algorithm.

The Implications of Aragon's Decision

Aragon's opposition to ProgPOW and similar proposals highlights the importance of community consensus in the Ethereum ecosystem. The Aragon community has officially proclaimed itself against ProgPOW. ProgPOW is a proposed protocol change to the Ehereum network that would close the efficiency gap available to application-specific integrated circuits.[BREAK] In a tweet on Nov. 2, the official account of the Aragon project posted voting results, showing that a proposal to block changes to Ethereum's mining algorithm hadIt demonstrates that significant changes to the protocol require broad support and careful consideration of potential consequences.While the decision may disappoint those who hoped to address ASIC dominance, it reinforces the community's commitment to a stable and well-managed transition to Ethereum 2.0.

The Aragon DAO uses Ethereum smart contracts to create and manage decentralized autonomous organizations.

Impact on Ethereum Miners

For Ethereum miners, Aragon's decision means that the current mining algorithm will remain in place until the transition to Proof-of-Stake. Aragon Opposes Change to Ethereum s Mining Algorithm Before 2.0 Version. The Aragon community has officially proclaimed itself against ProgPOW. ProgPOW is a proposed protocol change to the Ehereum network that would close the efficiency gap available to application-specific integrated circuits.This provides a degree of certainty and allows miners to continue operating without having to adapt to a new algorithm in the short term. Ethereum, which currently uses the ethash algorithm, is gearing up for a major change in governance from Proof-of-Work (PoW) to Proof-of-Stake (PoS). This piece follows an f2pool livestream discussion about the short and long-term opportunities and challenges presented by the changes to Ethereum.However, it also means that the efficiency advantage of ASICs will persist until the shift to PoS eliminates the need for mining altogether.

Ethereum 2.0: The Future of Consensus

The planned transition to Ethereum 2.0 represents a fundamental shift in how the Ethereum network achieves consensus. And also about the refusal of mining. Ethereum mining going away. Bitcoin and Ethereum, the two largest blockchains on the market, have one thing in common - the Proof of Work algorithm. In other words, mining. And this algorithm has a fundamental drawback - mining requires computing power. A high level of performance requires appropriate energy.The current Proof-of-Work (PoW) system, while secure, is energy-intensive and has limitations in terms of scalability. Read writing about Aragon in AMCgroup. This is an official information channel about AMC for communication with users. Welcome!Proof-of-Stake (PoS) offers a more energy-efficient and scalable alternative.

From Proof-of-Work to Proof-of-Stake

In a Proof-of-Stake system, validators, rather than miners, are responsible for verifying transactions and adding new blocks to the blockchain. Aragon Opposes Change to Ethereum's Mining Algorithm Before 2.0 Version Ethereum ethereum2.0 blockchain news cryptocurrency amc amcworld amczet amb amcblue amccoin amctravel mileageValidators are selected based on the amount of ETH (Ether) they stake, or lock up, as collateral. The Aragon community voted against Ethereum changing its proof-of-work mining algorithm before the release of Ethereum 2.0 Please note, this is a STATIC archive of website cointelegraph.com from, cach3.com does not collect or store any user information, there is no phishing involved.This staking mechanism incentivizes validators to act honestly, as they risk losing their staked ETH if they attempt to manipulate the network.

The Benefits of Proof-of-Stake

Energy Efficiency: PoS significantly reduces energy consumption compared to PoW, making Ethereum more environmentally friendly.
Scalability: PoS is designed to enable higher transaction throughput, addressing one of the key limitations of the current Ethereum network.
Security: PoS can offer enhanced security by making it more expensive and difficult for malicious actors to attack the network.

The Transition Process and Potential Challenges

The transition to Ethereum 2.0 is a complex and multi-phased process. With the upcoming launch of Ethereum 2.0, the landscape of mining and staking in the Ethereum network is set to undergo significant changes. Ethereum 2.0 introduces a shift from the current proof-of-work (PoW) consensus mechanism to a proof-of-stake (PoS) algorithm, known as the Beacon Chain.The Beacon Chain, which serves as the foundation for Ethereum 2.0, has already been launched and is responsible for managing the PoS consensus mechanism.The final step will be the complete merging of the current Ethereum mainnet with the Beacon Chain, effectively switching off the PoW mining algorithm and activating PoS for the entire network.This final step was previously known as the Merge.

Potential Challenges During the Transition

Technical Complexity: The transition to Ethereum 2.0 involves significant technical challenges, requiring careful planning and execution to avoid disruptions.
Security Risks: Introducing new technologies and consensus mechanisms can create potential security vulnerabilities that must be addressed.
Community Coordination: Successfully navigating the transition requires strong coordination and communication within the Ethereum community.

Mining After Ethereum 2.0: What Happens to Miners?

With the shift to Proof-of-Stake, the role of miners will be eliminated.The Etherum mining will be going away. Aragon是一個用於創建和管理去中心化自治組織（DAO）的開源軟體項目，它使用以太坊智能合約。 10月，Aragon宣布了其最新的Aragon Network投票，其中Aragon（ANT）代幣持有人能夠對各種提案進行投票，包括對以太坊挖礦演算法的更改。該提案指出：This raises the question of what will happen to the existing Ethereum miners and their hardware.While mining Ethereum will no longer be possible, miners may have several options:

Mine Other Cryptocurrencies: Miners can repurpose their hardware to mine other cryptocurrencies that still rely on Proof-of-Work algorithms.
Sell Hardware: Miners can sell their mining hardware to others who are interested in mining alternative cryptocurrencies.
Become Validators: While not all miners may have sufficient ETH to become validators, those who do can participate in the Proof-of-Stake system and earn rewards for validating transactions.

Ethash: The Ethereum Proof-of-Work Algorithm

Ethash was the mining algorithm used on the real Ethereum Mainnet under the proof-of-work architecture.Ethash was effectively a new name given to a specific version of Dagger-Hashimoto after the algorithm got significantly updated, whilst still inheriting the fundamental principles of its predecessor.

Conclusion: Navigating the Future of Ethereum Consensus

The Aragon community's decision to oppose changes to Ethereum's mining algorithm before the 2.0 version underscores the importance of stability and community consensus in navigating the evolution of the Ethereum network.While the debate surrounding ProgPOW and similar proposals highlights the ongoing tension between decentralization and risk management, the Ethereum community remains committed to a well-managed transition to Proof-of-Stake.As Ethereum moves closer to its 2.0 milestone, it is crucial to prioritize stability, security, and collaboration to ensure a successful and sustainable future for the decentralized ecosystem.By prioritizing a smooth transition, the Ethereum community aims to unlock the full potential of Proof-of-Stake, paving the way for a more scalable, energy-efficient, and secure blockchain platform.The key takeaways are:

The Aragon community voted against changes to Ethereum's mining algorithm before Ethereum 2.0.
This decision was driven by concerns about stability and the potential for disruptions during the transition to Proof-of-Stake.
The Ethereum network is undergoing a fundamental shift from Proof-of-Work to Proof-of-Stake.
The transition to Ethereum 2.0 promises greater energy efficiency, scalability, and security.
Miners will need to adapt to the new Proof-of-Stake system, either by mining alternative cryptocurrencies or becoming validators.

The future of Ethereum depends on the collaborative efforts of developers, miners, validators, and the broader community.By working together, they can ensure a successful transition to Ethereum 2.0 and unlock the full potential of decentralized technology.