LIGHTNING NETWORK AND

Last updated: June 17, 2025, 16:48  |  Written by: Chris Larsen

Lightning Network And
Lightning Network And

According To A Recent Reuters

The poll found that over two-thirds of respondents are anxious about the adverse effects of AI, while 61 percent consider it a potential threat to civilization.

How the U.S. Public and AI Experts View Artificial Intelligence

According to a recent Reuters/Ipsos survey, 61% of Americans are concerned about the dangers associated with artificial intelligence

A Reuters

Experts and the public aren’t confident that the government will regulate AI effectively: 62% of U.S. adults and 53% of the experts we surveyed say they have not too

According to a report by Stanford University’s Institute for Human-Centered A.I, 36% of computer science experts believed that decisions made by artificial intelligence

A Reuters/Ipsos poll published on Wednesday has found that 61 percent of Americans believe artificial intelligence (AI) could threaten civilization. Only 22 percent

More Than Two

AI threatens humanity’s future, 61% of Americans say: Survey

Poll: AI poses risk to humanity, according to majority of Americans

More than two-thirds of Americans are concerned about the negative effects of AI and 61% believe it could threaten civilization.

The Reuters

More than two-thirds of Americans are concerned about the negative effects of AI and 61% believe it could threaten civilization. The swift growth of artificial intelligence

AI threatens humanity’s future, 61% of Americans say:

The Reuters/Ipsos poll published Wednesday found that 61 percent of Americans believed AI is a threat to humanity’s future, while about 22 percent reported they

61% of Americans believe AI threatens civilization, reveals new poll

61% of Americans Feel Threatened by AI: One-third of Experts Agree

6 in AI as threat to humanity’s future: poll - The Hill

Chris Larsen can be reached at [email protected].

Articles tagged with "Robinhood to Acquire Bitstamp Despite SEC Scrutiny" (1 found)

← Back to article

Comments