COMMIT OVER

Last updated: June 18, 2025, 23:43  |  Written by: Fred Ehrsam

Commit Over
Commit Over

The Attack On Inverse Finance

The attack on Inverse Finance was a masterclass in exploiting vulnerabilities within DeFi protocols. Here's a breakdown of the key steps: Price Manipulation: The attacker began by

More than $15 million stolen after hackers exploit DeFi platform

Peckshield explained in another tweet that the exploit was possible due to a price oracle, a manipulation bug that allowed the hacker to manipulate the price of the native

Inverse Finance

Decentralized lending platform Inverse Finance has again become a victim of hackers, losing $1.26 million this time. Blockchain security and data analytics company

Inverse Finance, a decentralised finance protocol that generates yield on stablecoins has been the target of a new hack, with approximately $15 million worth of crypto

Inverse Finance Hack: A $5.8M Heist Exposes DeFi Vulnerabilities

An Attack On Decentralized Finance

Inverse Finance DeFi protocol hacked for $11.7M dollars

Millions Drained From Ethereum DeFi Protocol Inverse Finance

An attack on decentralized finance (DeFi) protocol Inverse Finance led to the theft of more than $15 million in cryptocurrency, the company said on Saturday.

Inverse Finance Defi Was Hacked

DeFi protocol Inverse Finance has been hacked: $15 million crypto

Inverse Finance DeFi was hacked earlier today with hacker taking whopping 11.7 million dollars, with protocol loss being much larger as less will be using it from now on.

DeFi protocol Inverse Finance hit by $15 million exploit

Inverse Finance

Inverse Finance, a stablecoin protocol that focuses on capital efficient yield generation, was drained in an exploit early Saturday. PeckShield, one of the crypto industry’s

Explained: The Inverse Finance Hack (June 2025)

DeFi Protocol Inverse Finance Hacked Again for $1.2M

Fred Ehrsam can be reached at [email protected].

Articles tagged with "TON blockchain to launch its Bitcoin cross-chain bridge" (1 found)

← Back to article

Comments