POTENTIALLY LOSING OVER

Last updated: June 16, 2025, 13:07  |  Written by: Olaf Carlson-Wee

Potentially Losing Over
Potentially Losing Over

Microstrategy Would Have Been In

MicroStrategy would have been in a better position if it had invested in Ethereum rather than bitcoin, and the numbers support this argument. According to Blockchain

Revealed: How MicroStrategy Would Have Performed if It Invested

MicroStrategy Could Be Up $1.5B If It Had Bought

What If MicroStrategy Chose Ethereum Instead of Bitcoin?

MicroStrategy is the largest institutional investor of BTC

If MicroStrategy invested in Ethereum over Bitcoin

Now

Now, if MicroStrategy had chosen to invest in Ethereum [ETH] instead of Bitcoin (BTC), the situation would have been different. According to data from Blockchain

According to sources, if these investments had been in Ethereum, over the same period, during those same times, for those exact amounts, MSTR's crypto stockpile

Yet a dashboard from Blockchain Center suggests that, if it had purchased Ether instead, MicroStrategy would still be sitting on a profit of $1.59 billion despite the

What Happened

What if MicroStrategy invested in ETH instead of BTC?

What If Microstrategy Invested in Ethereum Instead of Bitcoin

What Happened: According to archived statistics on blockchaincenter.net, Microstrategy’s portfolio could have been more profitable if it had invested in ETH instead of

Microstrategy

MicroStrategy, led by Michael Saylor, has only preferred to buy Bitcoin so far. What would have happened if they had chosen to buy Ethereum instead?

If Microstrategy Had Invested in Ethereum Instead Of Bitcoin

Olaf Carlson-Wee can be reached at [email protected].

Articles tagged with "Crypto: Ripple Intrigues with Massive XRP Transfers" (1 found)

← Back to article

Comments