BATTLE FOR BITCOIN CASH NAME ENDS AS BCH SV BACKER CALLS FOR PERMANENT SPLIT

Last updated: June 19, 2025, 21:55 | Written by: Elizabeth Stark

The tumultuous saga surrounding Bitcoin Cash (BCH) has seemingly reached a turning point.After a fierce hash war triggered by a contentious network upgrade in November, a prominent figure behind Bitcoin Cash SV (BSV), Calvin Ayre, has publicly declared that BSV will forge its own path, relinquishing any claim to the Bitcoin Cash name.This announcement marks a potential end to the infighting that has plagued the BCH community and sent ripples through the broader cryptocurrency market. Billionaire Entrepreneur and Bitcoin Cash SV (BCH SV) supporter Calvin Ayre has declared that the coin no longer want[s] the name Bitcoin Cash [BCH] in a article published Nov. 23. Posted onThe call for a permanent chain split aims to create a win-win scenario, allowing both BCH and BSV to pursue their respective visions for the future of digital currency.But what exactly led to this split, and what does it mean for the future of both Bitcoin Cash and Bitcoin SV? Ever since the Bitcoin Cash hard fork on Nov. 15, the two resulting camps have engaged in an intense battle over the hash power. Read More!This article delves into the details, exploring the reasons behind the divide, the implications for investors, and the potential future trajectories of these two distinct cryptocurrencies.

The Genesis of the Bitcoin Cash Split

To understand the current situation, it's crucial to rewind and examine the events that led to the initial Bitcoin Cash fork. Bitcoin SV is the original Bitcoin not the original Bitcoin Cash. Ayre calls on Bitcoin Cash ABC the Roger Ver-backed coin created in BCH s recent hard fork to permanently split the two chains for a win-win solution. The author also accuses supporters of both Bitcoin, which he refers to as Segwit BTC in theBitcoin Cash itself was born out of a disagreement within the Bitcoin community regarding the block size limit.Some developers and miners believed that increasing the block size was necessary to improve transaction throughput and reduce fees, while others favored maintaining the original 1MB block size and implementing scaling solutions like Segregated Witness (SegWit). CoinGeek will support a permanent chain split from Bitcoin Cash (BCH), continue mining the BSV chain, and will work with others globally to establish a vibrant ecosystem for the BSV coin. This ends the on-going BCH hash war triggered by the Novem network upgrade.This fundamental difference in opinion ultimately led to the hard fork in August 2017, resulting in the creation of Bitcoin Cash.

However, the story doesn't end there.Even within the Bitcoin Cash community, differing visions for the future of the cryptocurrency emerged. He delights that a 64MB block published on Bitcoin Cash SV proves to the world that we are correct and that Bitcoin, as originally designed, can already scale quite massively. There is even talk of expanding to 1GB blocks, putting the potential footprint of a Bitcoin Cash SV installation, in terms of storage space, at 144GB per day.These differences centered around the optimal block size, technical roadmap, and overall philosophy.This tension eventually culminated in another hard fork on November 15, 2018, splitting Bitcoin Cash into two competing chains: Bitcoin Cash ABC (BCH ABC), supported by Roger Ver, and Bitcoin Cash SV (BCH SV), championed by Calvin Ayre and Craig Wright, who famously (and controversially) claims to be Satoshi Nakamoto.

Key Differences Between BCH ABC and BCH SV

The primary points of contention between BCH ABC and BCH SV revolved around the following:

Block Size: BCH SV advocated for significantly larger block sizes, initially aiming for 128MB and eventually exploring 1GB blocks. Battle for Bitcoin Cash Name Ends as BCH SV Backer Calls for Permanent Split Major Bitcoin Cash SV supporter has declared that the new coin will continue independently from Bitcoin Cash.Their rationale was that larger blocks would allow for greater scalability and lower transaction fees.BCH ABC, on the other hand, preferred a more conservative approach with a smaller block size.
Technical Roadmap: BCH ABC proposed implementing new features and protocols, such as the Avalanche pre-consensus mechanism, to improve the efficiency and functionality of the network. Calvin Ayre, Billionaire Entrepreneur and Bitcoin Cash SV claims that Bitcoin Cash SV will continue to exist independently from Bitcoin Cash (BCH), and that the coin is in fact the originalBCH SV, in contrast, favored a more conservative approach, focusing on restoring what they considered to be the original vision of Bitcoin, with minimal modifications to the protocol.
Philosophy: BCH SV adherents believe that Bitcoin should primarily function as electronic cash, facilitating peer-to-peer transactions. Battle for Bitcoin Cash Name Ends as BCH SV Backer Calls for Permanent SplitBCH ABC, while also supporting the electronic cash use case, was more open to exploring other potential applications for the blockchain.

The Hash War and Its Aftermath

Following the November 2018 hard fork, a fierce ""hash war"" erupted between the two factions. Bitcoin SV is the original Bitcoin not the original Bitcoin Cash.[BREAK] Ayre calls on Bitcoin Cash ABC - the Roger Ver-backed coin created in BCH's recent hard fork - to Permanently split the two chains for a Win-win solution. [BREAK] The author also accuses supporters of both Bitcoin, which he refers to as Segwit BTC in the article, and Bitcoin Cash of having Tinkered it [BitcoinBoth BCH ABC and BCH SV dedicated significant hashing power to their respective chains, attempting to outpace each other and demonstrate dominance.This hash war resulted in network instability and uncertainty, contributing to a broader downturn in the cryptocurrency market.

Ultimately, BCH ABC emerged as the dominant chain, receiving more support from exchanges and miners. Der prominente Bitcoin Cash SV (BCH SV) F rsprecher Calvin Ayre hat behauptet, dass der Coin nicht l nger den Namen Bitcoin Cash (BCH) tragen will, wie aus einem Artikel vom 23. November hervorgeht. Besagter Artikel wurde auf CoinGeek, dem Nachrichtenportal von Ayre, ver ffentlicht, worinHowever, the conflict left a lasting impact on the Bitcoin Cash community and highlighted the challenges of governing decentralized cryptocurrencies. As the cryptocurrency markets continue to slip into another day of price fall, with headlines across the internet declaring Black Friday savings for Bitcoin and altcoins, the BCH fiasco encapsulated in the recent hash war is finally coming to an end. While the original Bitcoin Cash was at the center of a naming controversy when it splitThe hash war also demonstrated the potential for significant market volatility when competing factions within a cryptocurrency ecosystem clash.

Calvin Ayre's Declaration: A Call for Separation

In an article published on CoinGeek, Calvin Ayre, a prominent backer of BCH SV, declared that BCH SV no longer desires the Bitcoin Cash name.This statement signaled a significant shift in strategy, suggesting that BCH SV would focus on building its own ecosystem independently of BCH. Un importante sostenitore di Bitcoin Cash SV ha dichiarato che la blockchain della moneta continuer ad operare indipendentemente da Bitcoin Cash L'imprenditore miliardario Calvin Ayre, sostenitore di Bitcoin Cash SV (BCH SV), ha dichiarato che la moneta non vuole pi avere Bitcoin Cash nel suoAyre further called for a permanent split of the two chains, arguing that it would be a win-win solution for both parties.This declaration can be seen as an acknowledgement that the attempt to dominate the BCH chain had failed, and that pursuing a separate path was the most viable option for BSV.

Key Points from Ayre's Announcement

BCH SV will continue to exist independently from Bitcoin Cash (BCH).
BCH SV aims to establish a vibrant ecosystem for the BSV coin.
BCH SV views itself as the original Bitcoin, adhering to Satoshi Nakamoto's original vision.
Ayre accuses supporters of both Bitcoin (BTC) and Bitcoin Cash (BCH) of having ""tinkered"" with the original design.

What Does This Mean for Bitcoin Cash (BCH)?

With BCH SV seemingly stepping away from the fight for the Bitcoin Cash name, the path is now clear for Bitcoin Cash ABC (which largely retained the ""BCH"" ticker) to continue its development and pursue its vision. Publicada en CoinGeek, medio de comunicaci n sobre criptos propio de Ayre, la declaraci n afirma que el Bitcoin Cash SV seguir existiendo independientemente del Bitcoin Cash (BCH), y que la moneda es de hecho el Bitcoin original : Bitcoin SV es el Bitcoin original, no el Bitcoin Cash original .This could potentially lead to greater stability and reduced uncertainty within the BCH community. Billionaire Entrepreneur and Bitcoin Cash SV (BCH SV) supporter Calvin Ayre has declared that the coin no longer want[s] the name Bitcoin Cash [BCH] in a article published Nov. 23.However, the departure of BCH SV also removes a significant source of competition and innovation, which could ultimately impact the long-term development of Bitcoin Cash.

Potential Benefits for Bitcoin Cash

Reduced uncertainty and greater stability.
Focus on a unified vision for the future of BCH.
Easier integration with exchanges and wallets.

Potential Drawbacks for Bitcoin Cash

Reduced competition and potential for complacency.
Loss of innovative ideas from the BCH SV community.
Possible decline in market capitalization due to the separation.

The Future of Bitcoin SV (BSV): A Focus on Enterprise Adoption

With its sights set on independence, Bitcoin SV is now focused on carving out its own niche within the cryptocurrency landscape.BSV proponents believe that the original Bitcoin protocol, with its emphasis on scalability and low transaction fees, is best suited for enterprise applications and large-scale adoption. Major Bitcoin Cash SV supporter has declared that the new coin will continue independently from Bitcoin Cash. Please note, this is a STATIC archive of website cointelegraph.com from, cach3.com does not collect or store any user information, there is no phishing involved.They envision BSV being used for a wide range of use cases, including micropayments, data storage, and supply chain management.

The push for larger block sizes is a key component of the BSV strategy. Billionaire Entrepreneur and Bitcoin Cash SV (BCH SV) supporter Calvin Ayre has declared that the coin no longer want[s] the name Bitcoin Cash [BCH] in a article published Nov. 23. Posted on Ayre s own crypto media outlet CoinGeek, the statement claims that Bitcoin Cash SV will continue to exist independently from Bitcoin Cash (BCH), and that the coin is in fact the originalAdvocates argue that larger blocks are necessary to handle the volume of transactions required for enterprise adoption. Bitcoin Cash SV, which lost to Bitcoin Cash ABC in a recent hard fork drama, seeks to continue as an independent coin by giving up the name Bitcoin Cash Cointelegraph - Bitcoin Cash SV, which lost to BitcoinThe successful publication of a 64MB block on the BSV network is often cited as evidence that the technology is capable of scaling to meet the demands of real-world applications.There's even talk of expanding to 1GB blocks, potentially resulting in a significant increase in storage requirements for BSV nodes.

BSV's Value Proposition

Scalability: Larger block sizes enable higher transaction throughput.
Low Transaction Fees: Designed for efficient and affordable micropayments.
Enterprise Focus: Targeted at businesses and organizations seeking blockchain solutions.
Data Storage Capabilities: Potential for storing large amounts of data on the blockchain.

Challenges Facing Bitcoin SV

Centralization Concerns: Larger block sizes may lead to greater centralization of mining.
Storage Requirements: The potential for 1GB blocks could make it challenging for individuals to run full nodes.
Controversy Surrounding Leadership: The controversial figures associated with BSV can deter potential investors.
Adoption Hurdles: Achieving widespread enterprise adoption requires overcoming significant regulatory and technical challenges.

Investing in BCH and BSV: What to Consider

The split between BCH and BSV presents both opportunities and risks for investors. A major supporter of recently-forked coin Bitcoin Cash SV has declared that the blockchain will continue to operate independently from Bitcoin CashBefore making any investment decisions, it's crucial to carefully consider the following factors:

Your Risk Tolerance: Cryptocurrencies are inherently volatile, and both BCH and BSV carry significant risk. ビットコインキャッシュsv（bch sv）の大物支援者であるカルバン・アイヤー氏が、bch svがビットコインキャッシュ（bch）の名前を放棄すると宣言した。自身の運営するサイトでのべた。Assess your comfort level with potential losses before investing.
Your Investment Goals: Are you looking for short-term gains or long-term growth?Your investment goals should align with the potential of each cryptocurrency.
The Technological Fundamentals: Understand the technical differences between BCH and BSV and assess the potential of each technology.
The Community and Development Activity: Evaluate the strength of the community and the level of development activity surrounding each cryptocurrency.
The Regulatory Landscape: Be aware of the regulatory environment surrounding cryptocurrencies in your jurisdiction.

It's essential to conduct thorough research and consult with a financial advisor before investing in any cryptocurrency.Remember that past performance is not indicative of future results, and the value of cryptocurrencies can fluctuate significantly.

The Broader Implications for the Cryptocurrency Ecosystem

The Bitcoin Cash split and the subsequent departure of BCH SV highlight some of the fundamental challenges facing the cryptocurrency ecosystem. Menu. Home; Bitcoin Chart; Cryptocurrency News; Cryptocurrency Software; Privacy PolicyThe difficulty of achieving consensus in decentralized systems, the potential for ideological conflicts, and the impact of influential figures can all contribute to volatility and uncertainty.These events also underscore the importance of due diligence and critical thinking when evaluating cryptocurrencies.

Furthermore, the BSV experiment offers insights into the potential for blockchain technology to be applied to various enterprise use cases.Whether BSV succeeds in achieving its vision remains to be seen, but its efforts could pave the way for wider adoption of blockchain technology in the business world.

Answering Common Questions About the BCH and BSV Split

The split between Bitcoin Cash (BCH) and Bitcoin SV (BSV) has raised numerous questions.Here are some answers to common inquiries:

Why did Bitcoin Cash split?

Bitcoin Cash split due to fundamental disagreements within the community regarding block size, technical roadmap, and overall philosophy.These disagreements led to a hard fork in November 2018, resulting in the creation of two competing chains: BCH ABC and BCH SV.

What is the difference between BCH and BSV?

The main differences lie in block size (BSV initially aimed for larger blocks), technical roadmap (BCH ABC proposed new features while BSV focused on the original Bitcoin protocol), and philosophy (BSV emphasizing electronic cash while BCH ABC was more open to other applications).

Is BSV going to change its name?

While Calvin Ayre declared that BSV no longer wants the Bitcoin Cash name, the actual name of the cryptocurrency might not necessarily change.The declaration was more about forgoing any claim to the BCH chain and focusing on building a separate ecosystem.

Is BCH or BSV the ""real"" Bitcoin?

This is a matter of perspective and depends on one's interpretation of Satoshi Nakamoto's original vision.BCH SV proponents argue that BSV is the ""real"" Bitcoin because it adheres more closely to the original protocol.However, this claim is highly contested, and there is no definitive answer.

What should I do if I held BCH before the split?

If you held BCH before the split, you likely received an equivalent amount of BSV.You can access and manage your BSV by using a wallet that supports the BSV chain.However, it's important to remember that the value of BSV may fluctuate independently of BCH.

Conclusion: A New Chapter for Bitcoin Cash and Bitcoin SV

The battle for the Bitcoin Cash name has seemingly concluded with Calvin Ayre's declaration that BCH SV will pursue its own independent path.This marks a significant turning point in the history of Bitcoin Cash and could lead to greater stability and focus for both BCH and BSV.Bitcoin Cash can now concentrate on its vision for peer-to-peer electronic cash and explore new applications for the blockchain.Bitcoin SV, on the other hand, is betting on enterprise adoption and large-scale scalability.Only time will tell which of these visions will ultimately prevail.

Key takeaways:

The Bitcoin Cash community split due to disagreements over block size and development roadmap.
Calvin Ayre announced BCH SV would no longer seek the ""Bitcoin Cash"" moniker.
BCH can now focus on development and adoption without the BCH SV distraction.
BSV is now aiming for enterprise-level blockchain solutions with large block sizes.
Investors should carefully assess their risk tolerance and conduct thorough research before investing in either BCH or BSV.

As the cryptocurrency landscape continues to evolve, it's crucial to stay informed and adapt to new developments.The split between BCH and BSV serves as a reminder of the importance of critical thinking, due diligence, and understanding the risks involved in investing in digital assets.The future of both Bitcoin Cash and Bitcoin SV remains uncertain, but their journey will undoubtedly shape the future of blockchain technology and digital finance.