BIG BANKS WANT TO DESTROY BITCOIN BEFORE IT DESTROYS THEM

Last updated: June 19, 2025, 20:30 | Written by: Samson Mow

Big Banks Want To Destroy Bitcoin Before It Destroys Them
Big Banks Want To Destroy Bitcoin Before It Destroys Them

Imagine a world where your money isn't controlled by central institutions, a world where transactions are transparent and censorship-resistant. Bitcoin (BTC) $ 43,765.00 4.81%; Ethereum (ETH) $ 3,131.06 3.92%; Binance Coin (BNB) $ 376.14 5.52%This is the promise of Bitcoin, the revolutionary digital currency that has been capturing the attention of investors, technologists, and everyday people alike. Tl;Dr but here is my reason banks in the USA can't stop Bitcoin: China. Banning Bitcoin use by Americans will simply give China control of this new and likely unstoppable monetary technology. Really? America's willing to give up on what may be the most disruptive tech ever? Not likely. Bitcoin has the ball, Bitcoin is at bat, it is Bitcoin's move.However, this promise also poses a significant threat to the established financial order. 6.1M subscribers in the Bitcoin community. Bitcoin is the currency of the Internet: a distributed, worldwide, decentralized digital money. UnlikeBig banks, accustomed to their role as gatekeepers of the financial system, are increasingly viewing Bitcoin not as a novelty, but as a direct competitor. My teenage kids and friends are very engaged in crypto. They just don't see any appeal in bitcoin. They want to own whole coins in the next big thing. They want the 10,000x return. Bitcoin going up a bit (hopefully) is as boring to them as investing in stocks is to us. My pension returned 18% last year. Yawn. Bitcoin went from 20k to 60k. Yawn.Their potential loss of control over currency and financial transactions has triggered a defensive response, a strategic effort to limit Bitcoin's growing influence.This article delves into the reasons why big banks feel threatened by Bitcoin, the tactics they might employ to undermine it, and what the future might hold for this ongoing battle between traditional finance and decentralized cryptocurrency.

The Threat Bitcoin Poses to Traditional Banking

For decades, big banks have enjoyed a privileged position in the global economy.They control the flow of money, charge fees for transactions, and profit from the fractional reserve system.Bitcoin, with its decentralized nature, threatens to disrupt this established order in several key ways.

  • Decentralization: Bitcoin operates on a peer-to-peer network, eliminating the need for intermediaries like banks. Big Banks want to destroy Bitcoin before it destroys them. Bitcoin, the people s currency, has the potential to become a new currency, free of the control of big governments and big banks. That s why they both want to limit this potential. Each one in their own way.This removes their ability to control transactions and charge fees.
  • Transparency: All Bitcoin transactions are recorded on a public ledger, the blockchain. Big Banks Want to Destroy Bitcoin Before it Destroys Them Septem n Big Banks Suddenly Turning on Bitcoin is Sign of FearnThis level of transparency contrasts sharply with the opaque practices of traditional banks.
  • Censorship Resistance: Because Bitcoin is decentralized, it is difficult for any single entity to censor or control transactions.This is particularly appealing to individuals and businesses operating in countries with oppressive regimes.
  • Financial Inclusion: Bitcoin can provide access to financial services for the unbanked, particularly in developing countries where access to traditional banking is limited.

Why Are Big Banks So Afraid?

The potential for Bitcoin to erode their power and profitability is the primary reason why big banks are wary of it. Bitcoin was designed to function independently of any centralized authority, making it an appealing candidate for a replacement payment system. In order to have an understanding of how it does thisHere's a more detailed breakdown of their concerns:

  • Loss of Revenue: Transaction fees are a significant source of revenue for banks.Bitcoin's lower transaction fees (and potential for even lower fees with scaling solutions) could significantly impact their bottom line.
  • Disintermediation: Bitcoin bypasses traditional banking infrastructure, potentially rendering many banking services obsolete.
  • Loss of Control over Monetary Policy: If Bitcoin were to become a widely adopted currency, governments would lose their ability to control monetary policy, including printing money and setting interest rates.
  • Competition: Bitcoin represents a new form of competition for banks, one that is not subject to the same regulations and oversight.

Tactics Big Banks Might Use to ""Destroy"" Bitcoin

While ""destroy"" might be a strong word, big banks have various tactics they can employ to slow down or undermine Bitcoin's adoption:

  • Lobbying for Stricter Regulations: Banks can use their influence to lobby governments to impose strict regulations on Bitcoin, making it more difficult to use and acquire.In 2025, regulators in New York were already exploring ways to control Bitcoin. Big Banks want to destroy Bitcoin before it destroys them. Bitcoin, the people s currency, has the potential to become a new currency, free of the control of big governments and big banks.Some Wall Street executives feared that even regulating cryptocurrencies would legitimize them, indicating a complex and evolving strategy.
  • Spreading FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt): Banks can use their media connections to spread negative information about Bitcoin, highlighting its volatility, potential for illicit use, and environmental concerns.Recent negative statements by big banks reflect this strategy.
  • Creating Their Own Cryptocurrencies: Some banks are exploring the possibility of creating their own digital currencies, which would be centrally controlled and subject to traditional banking regulations. In 2025, as regulators in New York were exploring ways to control Bitcoin, executives at Wall Street s biggest banks fretted that regulating cryptocurrencies would also legitimize them andThis would allow them to compete with Bitcoin while maintaining control.
  • Restricting Access to Bitcoin Services: Banks can restrict access to Bitcoin exchanges and other services, making it more difficult for customers to buy and sell Bitcoin.The Nordea Bank incident, where employees were banned from buying Bitcoin, illustrates this approach.
  • Investing in Bitcoin Detractors: Banks may invest in projects or companies that actively work against Bitcoin, aiming to hinder its growth and development.

The Government's Role in the Bitcoin Narrative

It's not just the banks but governments as well that may feel threatened by Bitcoin.Consider the points where their interests might conflict:

  • Control of Currency: National governments typically have a monopoly on currency issuance. Big Banks want to destroy Bitcoin before it destroys them. Panos Mourdoukoutas in Forbes Magazine explains: Bitcoin, the people s currency, has the potential to become a new currency, free ofBitcoin, as a decentralized currency, challenges this control.
  • Taxation: Bitcoin's decentralized nature makes it more difficult to track transactions and collect taxes.
  • Regulation: Governments are still grappling with how to regulate Bitcoin, balancing the need to protect consumers with the desire to foster innovation.
  • National Security: Bitcoin's anonymity has raised concerns about its potential use for illicit activities, such as money laundering and funding terrorism.

These are complex issues that governments around the world are actively debating. Writing in Forbes, Panos Mourdoukoutas, a professor and Chair of the Department of Economics at LIU Post in New York, says that the big banks want to destroy Bitcoin before it destroys them. He says that Bitcoin could become a peoples currency and replace national currencies. If that happens, governments will lose the ability to printThe decisions they make will have a significant impact on the future of Bitcoin.

Is Bitcoin Truly a ""People's Currency""?

The idea of Bitcoin as a ""people's currency"" is central to its appeal. [ Novem ] Lindsey Graham Wants US To Sanction ICC News [ Novem ] US Big Banks Vow To Destroy Bitcoin, Replace It With MegaBut what does this really mean? 11K subscribers in the BitcoinAll community. All Bitcoin News. All Bitcoin discussion. All the time. BitcoinAll.It signifies several things:

  • Financial Sovereignty: Bitcoin empowers individuals to control their own money, free from the control of banks and governments.
  • Accessibility: Bitcoin is accessible to anyone with an internet connection, regardless of their location or socioeconomic status.
  • Transparency: The Bitcoin blockchain provides a transparent record of all transactions, promoting accountability and reducing the potential for corruption.
  • Decentralization: No single entity controls Bitcoin, making it resistant to censorship and manipulation.

However, it's important to acknowledge that Bitcoin is not without its challenges. Bitcoin always has had the potential to be a new currency free of control by big banks and governments, but as adoption has spread, the threat has become real. Limiting its potentialIts volatility, complexity, and potential for illicit use remain concerns. It seems as if the talk of the people s currency has started to sting the ears of those who traditionally have a monopoly of money, banks and governments. If this blog post has entertainedThe key lies in responsible regulation and increased user education to address these issues.

The Digital Payment Revolution and the Future of Banking

The rise of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies is part of a broader trend towards digital payments. 5.6M subscribers in the Bitcoin community. Bitcoin is the currency of the Internet: a distributed, worldwide, decentralized digital money. UnlikeThis technological shift is forcing the financial system to evolve.Banks are facing increasing pressure to adapt and innovate to remain relevant.

What are the potential outcomes?

  1. Collaboration: Banks may choose to collaborate with cryptocurrency companies, integrating Bitcoin and other digital assets into their existing services.
  2. Innovation: Banks may develop their own blockchain-based solutions to improve efficiency and reduce costs.
  3. Regulation: Increased regulation of the cryptocurrency industry may level the playing field between banks and crypto companies.
  4. Adaptation: Banks may focus on providing specialized services that are not easily replicated by cryptocurrencies, such as wealth management and lending.

The future of banking is likely to be a hybrid model, where traditional financial institutions coexist with decentralized cryptocurrency networks.

Understanding Bitcoin's Value Proposition

Bitcoin's value proposition extends beyond its potential as a currency. The last time crypto collapsed, regulators celebrated that the country s biggest banks had few ties to Bitcoin and other digital assets, leaving them unscathed. Next time may be different. AfterIt also serves as a store of value, a hedge against inflation, and a censorship-resistant payment system. Why Big Banks Attacked BitcoinUnderstanding these different aspects is crucial to appreciating its long-term potential.

  • Store of Value: Bitcoin's limited supply (21 million coins) makes it a potential store of value, similar to gold.
  • Hedge Against Inflation: As governments around the world print more money, Bitcoin's fixed supply can make it an attractive hedge against inflation. Big Banks Suddenly Turning on Bitcoin is Sign of Fear $ BTC $57,347 ; ETH $3,787 ; XRP $1.13 ; BCH $596 ; XMR $266.6 ; DASH $186 ; EOS $4.60 ; ZEC $122 ; ADA $2.168The Federal Reserve's massive giveaway to big banks has fueled inflation concerns.
  • Censorship-Resistant Payment System: Bitcoin allows individuals to send and receive payments without the need for intermediaries, making it resistant to censorship.
  • Global Settlement Layer: Bitcoin can be used as a global settlement layer, facilitating cross-border payments and reducing transaction costs.

Bitcoin vs.Fedcoins: A Looming Battle?

The idea of ""Fedcoins"" or central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) has gained traction in recent years.These digital currencies, issued and controlled by central banks, represent a direct challenge to Bitcoin's decentralized model.While the stated goals of CBDCs often include increased efficiency and financial inclusion, they also raise concerns about government surveillance and control.

The introduction of Fedcoins could create a bifurcated financial system, with CBDCs used for everyday transactions and Bitcoin used as a store of value and a hedge against inflation. Recent negative statements by big banks, and governmental crackdown on digital currencies and ICOs can be seen as fightbacks by these institutions to theThis scenario highlights the ongoing tension between centralized and decentralized finance.

Addressing Common Concerns About Bitcoin

Many legitimate concerns surround Bitcoin.Understanding these concerns is essential for evaluating its long-term viability:

  • Volatility: Bitcoin's price is notoriously volatile, making it a risky investment for some.
  • Scalability: Bitcoin's transaction processing capacity is limited, which can lead to slow transaction times and high fees.
  • Environmental Impact: Bitcoin mining consumes a significant amount of energy, raising environmental concerns.
  • Illicit Use: Bitcoin's anonymity has made it a target for illicit activities, such as money laundering and funding terrorism.
  • Regulatory Uncertainty: The regulatory landscape for Bitcoin is still evolving, creating uncertainty for investors and businesses.

These concerns are being actively addressed by developers, regulators, and the Bitcoin community.Technological advancements, such as the Lightning Network, are improving Bitcoin's scalability.Increased regulation and user education are helping to mitigate the risks of illicit use. Banks are primarily used for the sake of keeping your money safe and that to perform different kind of transactions. The survival of the banks is no doubt in danger and that the only reason behind that is all the crypto currencies can help the people in meeting all their needs and above all, it is also helping them in gaining more money because of the rise in the market value of the crypto coins.The debate surrounding Bitcoin's energy consumption continues, with proponents pointing to the increasing use of renewable energy in mining operations.

The Bottom Line: Can Bitcoin Survive?

Whether big banks can ""destroy"" Bitcoin is a matter of ongoing debate. The year is two-thousand-something-big, and it s the day your taxes are due. back before the central banks began taking paper cash and redeeming it for fedcoins. Over the years, you veWhile they certainly have the resources and influence to try, Bitcoin's decentralized nature and growing adoption make it a resilient force.The key to Bitcoin's survival lies in continued innovation, responsible regulation, and increased user adoption. Digital payments technology is forcing the financial system to evolve. Banks feel their power waning and want to regain control. By Emily Flitter In 2025, as regulators in New York were exploringThe Bitcoin community's strength of 6.1 million subscribers is a testament to this resiliency.The long-term success of Bitcoin depends on its ability to address its challenges and fulfill its promise as a decentralized, transparent, and censorship-resistant currency.

The narrative is shifting. Big banks have the money and governments have the power to put an end to Bitcoin. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Here s how it works. Step 1It's no longer about *if* digital currencies will play a role, but *how*. Nordea Bank bans bitcoin, gets caught in money laundering scandal. In January, Nordea Bank, the largest financial institution in the Nordic region, banned its some 31,000 employees from buying orThe next decade will reveal whether Bitcoin can overcome the challenges and become a truly global, people's currency, or whether the established financial order will succeed in limiting its potential.

Key Takeaways:

  • Big banks feel threatened by Bitcoin's decentralized nature and potential to disrupt their control over the financial system.
  • Banks may employ tactics such as lobbying for stricter regulations, spreading FUD, and creating their own digital currencies to undermine Bitcoin.
  • Bitcoin's value proposition extends beyond currency to include a store of value, a hedge against inflation, and a censorship-resistant payment system.
  • The future of banking is likely to be a hybrid model, where traditional financial institutions coexist with decentralized cryptocurrency networks.
  • Addressing concerns about volatility, scalability, environmental impact, and illicit use is crucial for Bitcoin's long-term survival.

What are your thoughts on the battle between big banks and Bitcoin?Share your opinion in the comments below!Are you ready to join the cryptocurrency revolution? Recent negative statements by big banks, and governmental crackdown on digital currencies and ICOs can be seen as fightbacks by these institutions to the growing popularity of Bitcoin. Bitcoin always has had the potential to be a new currency free of control by big banks and governments, but as adoption has spread, the threat has become real.Start researching Bitcoin and other digital assets today.

Samson Mow can be reached at [email protected].

Articles tagged with "Ethereum Miner Addresses Hits 4-year High Ahead of" (0 found)

No articles found with this tag.

← Back to article

Related Tags

cointelegraph.com › news › big-banks-want-to-destroyBig Banks Want to Destroy Bitcoin Before it Destroys Them www.forbes.com › 14 › why-big-banks-attacked-bitcoinWhy Big Banks Attacked Bitcoin - Forbes medium.com › chainrift-research › the-real-reasonThe real reason Big Banks hate Bitcoin www.technologyreview.com › lets-destroy-bitcoinLet s destroy Bitcoin - MIT Technology Review www.msn.com › en-us › moneyBanks Want to Crash the Bitcoin Party. Trump Is Opening - MSN www.nytimes.com › banks-crypto-bitcoinBanks Tried to Kill Crypto and Failed. Now They re Embracing bitcointalk.org › index[ ] Why Big Banks Attacked Bitcoin www.facebook.com › groups › CryptoLibRoCryptoLibRo mycriptocurrency.blogspot.com › 2025 › 09Big Banks Want to Destroy Bitcoin Before it Destroys Them www.reddit.com › r › BitcoinBig Banks Want to Destroy Bitcoin Before it Destroys Them medium.com › @katealdama › bitcoin-v-banks-a19ab0c1eee7Bitcoin v Banks. The biggest financial development - Medium crypto24hnews.com › article › big-banks-want-toBig Banks Want to Destroy Bitcoin Before it Destroys Them cointelegraph.com.cach3.com › news › big-banks-wantBig Banks Want to Destroy Bitcoin Before it Destroys Them www.dash.org › news › attackbitcoinGood read (no Dash) - Dash www.btcethereum.com › blog › Big Banks Want to Destroy Bitcoin Before it Destroys Them cryptoflame.blogspot.com › 2025 › 09Big Banks Want to Destroy Bitcoin Before it Destroys Them www.facebook.com › moneywisewithconnie › postsBig Banks want to destroy Bitcoin - Money Wise with Connie www.facebook.com › gomer › postsGomer Magtibay - Big Banks want to destroy Bitcoin before medium.com › @firaszahde › big-banks-want-to-destroyBig Banks Want to Destroy Bitcoin Before it Destroys Them blockonomi.com › wall-street-bitcoinExamining Wall Street s Love-Hate Relationship With Bitcoin

Comments