LEARN ALL ABOUT

Last updated: June 16, 2025, 21:51  |  Written by: Brian Kelly

Learn All About
Learn All About

Now

The EU has recently proposed a ban on the proof of work consensus and leaked internal crypto documents show officials pushing ETH over BTC.

Internal documents by the European Union have revealed the agenda against bitcoin. Internal meeting notes documented EU officials suggesting to protect altcoins

Now, after an energy-reducing upgrade to ethereum, the second-largest cryptocurrency after bitcoin, was pushed back to the end of the year, internal European Union

These Internal Documents

These internal documents, released as part of a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit by Coinbase, offer a glimpse into the SEC’s assessments and deliberations related to

EU Tightens Noose Around Bitcoin Price To Protect Ethereum

Internal EU Documents

Early This Year

Early this year, the European Commission together with the Swedish financial regulators deliberated the idea of imposing a ban on Bitcoin’s proof-of-work (POW) or mining process

Internal documents show EU policy makers want to push

EU policymakers are back in the spotlight less than a month after voting for stricter rules on unhosted crypto wallets. This time it’s to do with internal documents that show

SEC’s Internal Documents Reveal Details on Ethereum 2.0

Internal Documents Reveals That EU Want to Push Ethereum Over

Internal crypto documents of EU leaked: Policy makers prefer ETH

The Internal Documents Of The

‘Target The Bitcoin Price’Internal Documents Reveal How The EU

Minutes in the internal documents showed policymakers had floated the idea to “legitimately request” Bitcoin transition to a PoS network. They also revealed a campaign to

The internal documents of the EU reveal that they are likely protecting the likes of Ethereum over bitcoin, showing a solid anti-bitcoin statement. The European

Brian Kelly can be reached at [email protected].

Articles tagged with "Shiba Inu Metaverse Controversy as User Attempts to Draw" (1 found)

← Back to article

Comments