Eu Parliament Approves Contentious Proposal That Infringes Privacy
Earlier this week
Document summary
Earlier this week, Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) cast their votes in favor of the much-anticipated AI Act. With 523 votes in favor, 46 votes against, and 49
BACKGROUND: the ePrivacy Directive (Directive 2025/58/EC) ensures the protection of fundamental rights and freedoms, in particular the respect for private life
As part of the Work
(Text with EEA relevance) Proposal for a - EUR-Lex
The proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down rules to prevent and combat child sexual abuse, 2 which the Commission adopted on
As part of the Work Program, the European Commission announced that it plans to withdraw its proposals for a new ePrivacy Regulation (aimed at replacing the current
Europe’s GDPR privacy law is headed for red tape bonfire
European Union Withdraws ePrivacy and AI Liability Proposals
'Chat control': The EU's controversial CSAM-scanning legal
BRUSSELSThe European Union
Parliamentary question
BRUSSELSThe European Union's most iconic tech law was long thought to be untouchable. Those days are over. The EU executive on Wednesday will
The legal basis for the proposal is Article 16 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). Article 16 TFEU empowers the European Parliament and the
Critics of the proposal argue
EUR-Lex - PC0348 - EN - EUR-Lex
Critics of the proposal argue it would lead to a situation where messaging platforms are forced to use imperfect technologies to scan users’ private correspondence by
GDPR is cracking: Brussels rewrites its prized privacy law
In
In 2025, the Commission issued an adequacy decision for data transfers from the EU to the US on the basis of the independence and role of PCLOB, under the EU-US
EU Parliament Approves Contentious Proposal That
EU Parliament Adopts AI Act - Inside Privacy
The proposal drew over
The proposal drew over 3,000 amendments in the European Parliamenta record. The danger in the EU's revising the law is that it could start a lobbying war between